Quickly find verified, easy-to-understand facts on key national issues.

A reference tool for the rest of us.

Search By Keyword

Use our custom search bar to find exactly what you need.

Dive Into Topics

Learn the larger context behind a variety of key topics.

Browse Random Facts

Scan through our bullet-point-style headlines to find facts you might not already know.

Browse Facts By Topic

Anti-Semitism
Budget and Taxes
Conflicts Of Interest
Corruption and Fraud
Demographics
Economy
Education
Environment
Executive Orders
Fake News
Flip Flops
Government Regulations
Healthcare
Immigration
International Relations
LGBTQ
Mexico Wall
Muslims
National Security and Military Operations
North Korea
Obama
Philanthropy
Polls
Racism
Russia
Supreme Court
Transparency
Women

Browse Random Facts

Array ( [post_type] => post [exclude_post_format] => [offset] => [posts] => [suppress_filters] => 1 [orderby] => rand [order] => ASC [author] => [count] => [cat] => )
Array ( [wp_query] => WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => post [posts_per_page] => 0 [suppress_filters] => 0 [orderby] => rand [order] => ASC [paged] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => post [posts_per_page] => 10 [suppress_filters] => 0 [orderby] => rand [order] => [paged] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [static] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [ignore_sticky_posts] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND wp_posts.post_type = 'post' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish' OR wp_posts.post_status = 'acf-disabled') ORDER BY RAND() LIMIT 0, 10 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 2104 [post_author] => 1 [post_date] => 2017-06-25 22:54:22 [post_date_gmt] => 2017-06-25 22:54:22 [post_content] => On Monday June 12 2017, "the attorneys general for Maryland and the District of Columbia filed a lawsuit in a Maryland federal court, saying that Trump's failure to sell off his interests in hotels, golf courses, office buildings and other properties is undermining public trust and violating the U.S. Constitution's Emoluments Clause."  View the actual filing here. On January 23 2017 the non-profit legal watchdog group Citizens For Responsibility and Ethics in Washington filed a similar suit, claiming Trump has violated the Emoluments Clause. 30 Democratic Senators and 166 Democratic congresspeople filed a lawsuit on June 14 2017 also for violating the Emoluments Clause, a lawsuit that also has the largest number of congressional plantiffs in history. The emoluments clause states "no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince or foreign State."  Accepting gifts or other types of payments (i.e. revenue from businesses both domestically and abroad from foreign customers) by Trump and his businesses is, according to each of these lawsuits, a violation of the Emoluments Clause. The "lawsuit filed by D.C. and Maryland against President Trump over his alleged business conflicts has been expanded to include Trump in his personal capacity as a businessman" meaning Trump was issued a personal summons and will be directly included in this lawsuit.    
Geewax, Marilyn. "Attorneys General Of Maryland And D.C. Sue Trump Over His Businesses." NPR. NPR, 12 June 2017. Web. 25 June 2017.
"2017-06-17 Complaint Against Donald J. Trump as Filed".  OAG.dc.gov.  The State of Maryland; the District of Columbia.  12 June 2017.  Web. 25 June 2017.
"CREW Sues Trump over Emoluments." CREW. Citizens For Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, 23 Jan. 2017. Web. 25 June 2017.
"2017 1 23 Lawsuit Against Donald J. Trump as Filed." DocumentCloud. Citizens For Responsibility and Ethics In Washington, 23 Jan. 2017. Web. 25 June 2017.
"Congressional Emoluments Complaint FINAL." Theusconstitution.org. N.p., 15 June 2017. Web. 25 Jan. 2017.
Gorman, Michele. "Nearly 200 Democrats Sue Trump over Business Deals." Newsweek. N.p., 15 June 2017. Web. 25 June 2017.
Frazee, Gretchen. "How the Emoluments Clause Is Being Used to Sue Trump." PBS. Public Broadcasting Service, 22 June 2017. Web. 25 June 2017.
[post_title] => 3 Lawsuits Filed Against Trump For Violating Emoluments Clause (Financial Conflicts Of Interest By President); One By 196 Democratic Senators And Congresspeople, One By Attorneys General Of MD And DC, One By Ethics Watchdog Group [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => 3-lawsuits-filed-trump-financial-conflicts-interest-one-196-democratic-senators-congresspeople-one-attorneys-general-md-dc-one-ethics-watchdog-group [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2018-03-24 11:14:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2018-03-24 11:14:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => http://factualuprising.com/?p=2104 [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => post [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 2409 [post_author] => 1 [post_date] => 2017-11-04 17:35:27 [post_date_gmt] => 2017-11-04 17:35:27 [post_content] => On Monday October 20, 2017 a Federal Judge blocked President Trump's recent ban of transgender troops from entering and serving in the U.S. Military and a ban of using federal funds for gender reassignment treatments or procedures.

Federal District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly wrote in her decision that "there is absolutely no support for the claim that the ongoing service of transgender people would have any negative effective on the military at all and "in fact, there is considerable evidence that it is the discharge and banning of such individuals that would have such effects."

The judge also noted "a number of factors — including the sheer breadth of the exclusion ordered by the directives, the unusual circumstances surrounding the President’s announcement of them, the fact that the reasons given for them do not appear to be supported by any facts, and the recent rejection of those reasons by the military itself — strongly suggest that Plaintiffs’ Fifth Amendment claim is meritorious."

[post_title] => Federal Judge Blocks Trump's Ban Of Transgender Troops From U.S. Military, Noting That It Doesn't "Appear To Be Supported By Any Facts" [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => federal-judge-blocks-trumps-ban-transgender-troops-u-s-military-noting-doesnt-appear-supported-facts [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2017-11-04 17:42:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2017-11-04 17:42:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => http://factualuprising.com/?p=2409 [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => post [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 2429 [post_author] => 1 [post_date] => 2017-11-23 20:10:38 [post_date_gmt] => 2017-11-23 20:10:38 [post_content] => Donald Trump Jr. exchanged direct Twitter messages with Wikileaks during the 2016 Presidential campaign.  The messages, turned over to those investigating Russian interference in the election, show a willingness to cooperate with Wikileaks and didn't stop with the Twitter messages:

On the same day that Trump Jr. received the first message from WikiLeaks, he emailed other senior officials with the Trump campaign, including Steve Bannon, Kellyanne Conway, Brad Parscale, and Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner, telling them WikiLeaks had made contact. Kushner then forwarded the email to campaign communications staffer Hope Hicks. At no point during the 10-month correspondence does Trump Jr. rebuff WikiLeaks, which had published stolen documents and was already observed to be releasing information that benefited Russian interests.

Trump Jr's interactions with Wikileaks indicate violations of federal campaign finance rules, which "disallows contributions, donations, or 'anything of value' provided by a foreign national to sway an election. It also bars a campaign from offering 'substantial assistance' to a foreign national engaged in spending on American races"  (Wikileaks is a foreign based company). [post_title] => Trump Jr. Interacted With Wikileaks During 2016 Presidential Campaign; Foreign Influence In Campaign Violates Federal Campaign Rules [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => 2429 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2017-11-23 20:11:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2017-11-23 20:11:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => http://factualuprising.com/?p=2429 [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => post [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 2424 [post_author] => 1 [post_date] => 2017-11-19 21:16:04 [post_date_gmt] => 2017-11-19 21:16:04 [post_content] => Trump canceled the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade agreement with one of his first Executive Orders as President. The original agreement eased trade regulations and limits tariffs between all member countries.  It notably excluded China and India and included the United States, leaving the U.S. in the driver’s seat of trade in this region (simply from the volume of goods consumed and produced). On November 11, 2017 the remaining 11 countries announced preliminary plans to move forward with an agreement without the United States.  The details of the revised plan have not been confirmed or made public, and "the revisions required for the 11 remaining TPP countries to continue talks required a difficult balance between high standards and pragmatism, said Japanese Economy Minister Toshimitsu Motegi." For each of the countries included, the agreement "will eliminate over 95 per cent of their tariffs." "The members of the CPTPP represent 494 million people, with a combined GDP of US$10.2 trillion, or 13.6% of global GDP." [post_title] => 11 Remaining Countries In The Trans-Pacific Partnership International Trade Agreement Announce Preliminary Plans To Move Forward Without United States [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => 11-remaining-countries-trans-pacific-partnership-international-trade-agreement-announce-preliminary-plans-move-forward-without-united-states [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2017-11-19 21:16:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2017-11-19 21:16:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => http://factualuprising.com/?p=2424 [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => post [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 910 [post_author] => 1 [post_date] => 2017-01-24 04:47:38 [post_date_gmt] => 2017-01-24 04:47:38 [post_content] => Out of 24 Cabinet positions in the first cabinet of the Trump administration:        
Lee, Jasmine. "Trump's Cabinet So Far Is More White and Male Than Any First Cabinet Since Reagan's." NY Times. NY Times, 23 Jan. 2017. Web. 23 Jan. 2017.
[post_title] => President Trump's Cabinet Is The "Most White And Male" First Cabinet In 37 Years [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => trumps-cabinet-white-male-first-cabinet-since-reagan [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2017-09-18 11:57:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2017-09-18 11:57:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => http://factualuprisin.wpengine.com/?p=910 [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => post [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 2305 [post_author] => 1 [post_date] => 2017-08-20 19:51:13 [post_date_gmt] => 2017-08-20 19:51:13 [post_content] => The Federal Department of Justice (DoJ) issued a search warrant to DreamHost, the company hosting the website disruptj20.org, which organizes political protests across the country against the current administration. The search warrant "demands that DreamHost hand over 1.3 million visitor IP addresses to the disruptj20.org website, along with contact information, email content, and photos of thousands of people." DreamHost denied this request and the case is now headed to court. [post_title] => Federal Department Of Justice Requests Information On 1.3 Million Visitors To Anti-Trump Website [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => federal-department-justice-requests-information-1-3-million-visitors-anti-trump-website [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2017-08-20 19:51:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2017-08-20 19:51:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => http://factualuprising.com/?p=2305 [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => post [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 1923 [post_author] => 1 [post_date] => 2017-05-10 00:48:20 [post_date_gmt] => 2017-05-10 00:48:20 [post_content] => "President Trump is receiving a proposal from top advisers to send thousands more U.S. troops to Afghanistan and loosen the rules of engagement, all part of an effort to assist Afghan allies and put renewed pressure on the Taliban." The plan reportedly calls for 3,000-5,000 more troops and allows the Pentagon to set troop numbers rather than the White House. "There currently are 8,400 U.S. troops in Afghanistan, down from a high of 100,000 in 2011." Other NATO countries also operate in Afghanistan, and the total international troop total is around 13,000 including U.S. troops. General John W. Nicholson, the top American commander in Afghanistan, testified in front of congress in February 2017 and "said more personnel would enable the American military to advise the Afghan military more effectively and at lower levels in the chain of command." General Nicholson also noted that this shortfall was "mainly in forces for training and advising the Afghans".      
"Trump Weighs Plan to Send Thousands More US Troops to Afghanistan." Fox News. FOX News Network, 09 May 2017. Web. 09 May 2017.
Gordon, Michael R. "Trump Advisers Call for More Troops to Break Afghan Deadlock." The New York Times. The New York Times, 08 May 2017. Web. 09 May 2017.
[post_title] => Trump Evaluating Sending 3,000-5,000 More Troops To Afghanistan [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => trump-evaluating-sending-3000-5000-troops-afghanistan [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2017-07-31 00:38:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2017-07-31 00:38:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => http://factualuprising.com/?p=1923 [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => post [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 2421 [post_author] => 1 [post_date] => 2017-11-12 13:38:12 [post_date_gmt] => 2017-11-12 13:38:12 [post_content] => On Tuesday October 24, 2017 the Senate voted to repeal a rule that would allow consumers to engage in class action lawsuits against large financial institutions.  The Senate vote was 50-50, with Vice President Pence casting the tie breaking vote. The rule was issued in July of 2017 by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in an effort to protect the rights of individual consumers to"join together to pursue justice and relief through group lawsuits" on behalf of all consumers harmed, even when the "amounts at stake are small", such as excess fees and charges on bank accounts. [post_title] => Senate Votes To Block Class Action Lawsuits Against Financial Institutions [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => senate-votes-block-class-action-lawsuits-financial-institutions [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2017-11-12 13:38:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2017-11-12 13:38:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => http://factualuprising.com/?p=2421 [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => post [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 2654 [post_author] => 1 [post_date] => 2018-09-01 13:30:24 [post_date_gmt] => 2018-09-01 13:30:24 [post_content] => On Tuesday August 1, 2018 Microsoft announced it has identified and removed websites with an apparent intention "to trick people into thinking they were clicking through links managed by the Hudson Institute and the International Republican Institute, but were secretly redirected to web pages created by the hackers to steal passwords and other credentials." The target of these sites and actions were "conservative American think tanks that have broken with President Trump and are seeking continued sanctions against Moscow, exposing oligarchs or pressing for human rights." The sites were developed by the same group "behind the 2016 hack of the Democratic National Committee and directed by the GRU, the Russian military intelligence unit, according to cybersecurity firms." [post_title] => Microsoft Identifies And Shuts Down Websites Built By Russians Seeking To Hack And Influence Anti-Trump Conservatives [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => microsoft-identifies-shuts-websites-built-russians-seeking-hack-influence-anti-trump-conservatives [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2018-09-01 13:30:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2018-09-01 13:30:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => http://factualuprising.com/?p=2654 [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => post [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 2619 [post_author] => 1 [post_date] => 2018-07-08 15:52:49 [post_date_gmt] => 2018-07-08 15:52:49 [post_content] => On Friday July 6, 2018, the last day of Scott Pruit's tenure as Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, "agency officials confirmed to The New York Times that, through the end of 2019, the E.P.A. will not enforce an annual cap of 300 gliders per manufacturer that had been imposed in January."  These trucks can pollute up to 55 times more than new diesel freight trucks. Gliders are "brand new trucks, but without an engine or transmission (hence why they 'glide'). This category of truck was created so manufacturers could salvage parts from older trucks, or parts from those damaged in accidents.  However, older engines adhere to older pollution standards" and don't include pollution reduction or fuel efficiency technologies found in new truck engines. [post_title] => EPA Removes Manufacturing Production Limit Of Diesel Freight Trucks That Pollute Up To 55 Times As Much As Modern Trucks [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => epa-removes-manufacturing-production-limit-diesel-freight-trucks-pollute-55-times-much-modern-trucks [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2018-07-08 15:52:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2018-07-08 15:52:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => http://factualuprising.com/?p=2619 [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => post [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 10 [current_post] => -1 [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 2104 [post_author] => 1 [post_date] => 2017-06-25 22:54:22 [post_date_gmt] => 2017-06-25 22:54:22 [post_content] => On Monday June 12 2017, "the attorneys general for Maryland and the District of Columbia filed a lawsuit in a Maryland federal court, saying that Trump's failure to sell off his interests in hotels, golf courses, office buildings and other properties is undermining public trust and violating the U.S. Constitution's Emoluments Clause."  View the actual filing here. On January 23 2017 the non-profit legal watchdog group Citizens For Responsibility and Ethics in Washington filed a similar suit, claiming Trump has violated the Emoluments Clause. 30 Democratic Senators and 166 Democratic congresspeople filed a lawsuit on June 14 2017 also for violating the Emoluments Clause, a lawsuit that also has the largest number of congressional plantiffs in history. The emoluments clause states "no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince or foreign State."  Accepting gifts or other types of payments (i.e. revenue from businesses both domestically and abroad from foreign customers) by Trump and his businesses is, according to each of these lawsuits, a violation of the Emoluments Clause. The "lawsuit filed by D.C. and Maryland against President Trump over his alleged business conflicts has been expanded to include Trump in his personal capacity as a businessman" meaning Trump was issued a personal summons and will be directly included in this lawsuit.    
Geewax, Marilyn. "Attorneys General Of Maryland And D.C. Sue Trump Over His Businesses." NPR. NPR, 12 June 2017. Web. 25 June 2017.
"2017-06-17 Complaint Against Donald J. Trump as Filed".  OAG.dc.gov.  The State of Maryland; the District of Columbia.  12 June 2017.  Web. 25 June 2017.
"CREW Sues Trump over Emoluments." CREW. Citizens For Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, 23 Jan. 2017. Web. 25 June 2017.
"2017 1 23 Lawsuit Against Donald J. Trump as Filed." DocumentCloud. Citizens For Responsibility and Ethics In Washington, 23 Jan. 2017. Web. 25 June 2017.
"Congressional Emoluments Complaint FINAL." Theusconstitution.org. N.p., 15 June 2017. Web. 25 Jan. 2017.
Gorman, Michele. "Nearly 200 Democrats Sue Trump over Business Deals." Newsweek. N.p., 15 June 2017. Web. 25 June 2017.
Frazee, Gretchen. "How the Emoluments Clause Is Being Used to Sue Trump." PBS. Public Broadcasting Service, 22 June 2017. Web. 25 June 2017.
[post_title] => 3 Lawsuits Filed Against Trump For Violating Emoluments Clause (Financial Conflicts Of Interest By President); One By 196 Democratic Senators And Congresspeople, One By Attorneys General Of MD And DC, One By Ethics Watchdog Group [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => 3-lawsuits-filed-trump-financial-conflicts-interest-one-196-democratic-senators-congresspeople-one-attorneys-general-md-dc-one-ethics-watchdog-group [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2018-03-24 11:14:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2018-03-24 11:14:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => http://factualuprising.com/?p=2104 [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => post [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 382 [max_num_pages] => 39 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => 1 [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 5cd101cc3ae72f87a74483e744716f29 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => [thumbnails_cached] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) ) [paged] => 1 )

3 Lawsuits Filed Against Trump For Violating Emoluments Clause (Financial Conflicts Of Interest By President); One By 196 Democratic Senators And Congresspeople, One By Attorneys General Of MD And DC, One By Ethics Watchdog Group

On Monday June 12 2017, “the attorneys general for Maryland and the District of Columbia filed a lawsuit in a Maryland federal court, saying that Trump’s failure to sell off his interests in hotels, golf courses, office [...]

Start typing and press Enter to search